Openness to Experience (HEXACO): Meaning, Traits and Behaviour

Openness to Experience is one of the six major personality dimensions in the HEXACO model. It describes how strongly people are attracted to new ideas, intellectual exploration, artistic experiences, creative expression and unconventional ways of thinking. Individuals who score highly tend to enjoy discovering unfamiliar concepts, appreciate beauty in art and nature, experiment with original ideas and remain receptive to perspectives that differ from conventional expectations. Those who score lower generally prefer familiar approaches, place less importance on artistic and intellectual exploration, and feel less attracted to unusual ideas or experiences.

Openness is particularly interesting because it captures a dimension of personality that extends beyond everyday social behaviour. Whereas Extraversion concerns social engagement and Conscientiousness describes how people organise their activities, Openness reflects the way individuals approach the world of ideas, imagination and experience. Some people feel an almost constant desire to understand unfamiliar subjects, explore alternative possibilities or discover new forms of expression. Others are more satisfied with established knowledge, familiar activities and practical approaches that have already proved useful.

However, Openness should not be confused with intelligence, education or cultural sophistication. Someone can be highly intelligent while having little interest in abstract ideas or artistic experimentation, just as an intellectually curious individual may possess entirely ordinary cognitive abilities. Similarly, lower Openness does not necessarily indicate narrow-mindedness, poor judgement or an inability to appreciate beauty.

Like the other HEXACO dimensions, Openness exists on a continuous spectrum rather than dividing people into fixed personality types. Most individuals fall somewhere between the extremes, and their scores may differ considerably across its four underlying facets: Aesthetic Appreciation, Inquisitiveness, Creativity and Unconventionality.

These guides describe the HEXACO-PI-R trait framework. TypologyOnline uses a separate 96-item IPIP-based assessment; its facet labels and scores are not interchangeable with the official inventory.

What Is Openness to Experience?

The HEXACO personality model was developed through research examining how personality-descriptive characteristics cluster across different languages. Psychologists Kibeom Lee and Michael C. Ashton helped establish the six-factor framework, identifying Openness to Experience as one of the broad dimensions that consistently emerged from these investigations.

Openness is also a major dimension in the traditional Big Five model, and the two frameworks share considerable similarities. Both describe differences involving imagination, curiosity, appreciation of aesthetic experiences and receptiveness to unfamiliar ideas. However, HEXACO organises these characteristics into four specific facets, distinguishing an individual's enjoyment of beauty from their desire for knowledge, preference for creative activity and willingness to entertain unconventional perspectives.

This distinction matters because people can be curious in very different ways. Someone might spend hours studying mathematics, history or scientific theories while displaying little interest in artistic expression. Another person might be deeply moved by music and literature without enjoying technical or abstract subjects. A third might enjoy inventing practical solutions to problems while remaining relatively conventional in their beliefs and personal preferences.

Openness is therefore better understood as a family of related tendencies involving exploration and imagination, rather than a single measure of how intellectual, artistic or adventurous someone happens to be.

Openness to Experience at a Glance

These descriptions represent general tendencies rather than rigid categories. A high score does not guarantee creativity, intelligence or originality, while a low score does not prevent someone from learning difficult subjects or developing innovative solutions. The meaning of the overall dimension also depends on the individual's particular combination of facets.

The Psychological Perspective: Curiosity and Exploration

One useful way of understanding Openness is through the concept of cognitive exploration: the tendency to engage with unfamiliar information, possibilities and experiences. Human beings differ in how rewarding they find the process of discovering something new. For some, uncertainty and complexity are inherently interesting, providing opportunities to investigate, imagine and reconsider existing assumptions. For others, unfamiliarity is less attractive, and there is greater satisfaction in applying established knowledge to familiar situations.

Higher Openness is often associated with a willingness to explore ideas without requiring an immediate practical reward. Someone may read about astronomy, study an unfamiliar philosophical argument or visit an art exhibition simply because the experience is interesting. Their motivation comes partly from the enjoyment of exploration itself rather than from a specific external objective.

Lower scorers may place greater emphasis on direct usefulness, familiarity or established methods. They may prefer learning information that helps accomplish a practical task rather than exploring subjects for their own sake. This does not mean they are incapable of curiosity; rather, their interests may be narrower, more specialised or more strongly connected to immediate needs.

Researchers have also discussed Openness in relation to flexibility of thought and the generation of alternative possibilities. A willingness to consider unfamiliar ideas can encourage experimentation and originality, but it does not guarantee that those ideas will be accurate or useful. Effective thinking requires both openness to possibilities and the ability to evaluate them critically.

The Four Facets of Openness to Experience

HEXACO Openness consists of four narrower facets: Aesthetic Appreciation, Inquisitiveness, Creativity and Unconventionality. Although they share an interest in exploration and unfamiliar experiences, each measures a different tendency. Understanding these distinctions is particularly important because an individual may be highly curious about scientific ideas while remaining relatively indifferent to art, or strongly creative while possessing conventional beliefs.

1. Aesthetic Appreciation: Sensitivity to Beauty vs. Practical Indifference

Aesthetic Appreciation concerns how strongly someone enjoys beauty in art and nature, rather than whether they possess artistic talent or refined cultural tastes.

Aesthetic Appreciation measures the tendency to become absorbed in the beauty of artistic works and natural surroundings. High scorers often find music, painting, architecture, literature or natural landscapes deeply engaging. They may spend considerable time contemplating a work of art, feel moved by a particular piece of music or experience a strong sense of wonder when observing dramatic scenery. Aesthetic experiences can hold considerable personal significance even when they provide no obvious practical benefit.

Lower scorers tend to experience less intense interest in these aspects of life. They may appreciate attractive surroundings or enjoy entertainment without feeling particularly absorbed by artistic beauty. A visit to a gallery, for example, might be pleasant but not especially meaningful, while a dramatic landscape may be regarded primarily as an enjoyable place to walk rather than an experience that inspires prolonged contemplation.

An important distinction exists between Aesthetic Appreciation and artistic ability. Someone can be deeply moved by music without being able to play an instrument, while a technically accomplished musician may approach performance primarily as a practical skill. Similarly, enjoying sophisticated art does not establish that someone possesses superior intelligence or cultural understanding.

Nor does high Aesthetic Appreciation necessarily imply a preference for traditional high culture. Someone might respond strongly to film, electronic music, photography, architecture or the visual design of everyday objects. What matters is the intensity of appreciation and engagement, not the prestige associated with a particular artistic form.

2. Inquisitiveness: Intellectual Curiosity vs. Limited Interest in Exploration

Inquisitiveness concerns the desire to acquire knowledge, rather than the intellectual ability required to understand it.

Inquisitiveness measures how strongly individuals are motivated to learn about the natural and human world. High scorers often enjoy reading widely, investigating unfamiliar subjects and discovering how things work. They may develop interests in science, history, technology, geography, philosophy or other fields without requiring those interests to serve an immediate practical purpose. For such individuals, understanding something new can be rewarding in itself.

Lower scorers tend to feel less compelled to explore unfamiliar areas of knowledge. They may prefer concentrating on subjects relevant to their work, responsibilities or existing interests rather than investigating topics simply because they are intellectually stimulating. Someone might be highly competent in a demanding profession while having relatively little desire to study unrelated subjects during their free time.

Consider two people encountering an unfamiliar scientific idea. One becomes intrigued, begins reading about the underlying theory and follows several related questions out of curiosity. The other learns enough to understand its practical significance before returning to more immediate interests. Neither response establishes which person is more intelligent; it illustrates a difference in the motivation to explore knowledge.

Inquisitiveness is especially important to distinguish from cognitive ability. Intelligence concerns capacities such as reasoning, learning and problem-solving, whereas Inquisitiveness concerns the desire to engage with information. Although intellectual curiosity and cognitive ability can be related, they are not interchangeable. A highly intelligent person may have little interest in broad intellectual exploration, while someone of average ability may maintain an unusually wide range of interests.

High Inquisitiveness can encourage lifelong learning and the acquisition of knowledge across different fields. However, pursuing numerous interests may sometimes make it difficult to concentrate on a single objective, particularly when new questions continually attract attention. Whether curiosity becomes productive depends partly on discipline, available time and the ability to organise what has been learned.

3. Creativity: Original Thinking vs. Preference for Established Solutions

HEXACO Creativity concerns the inclination towards original ideas, experimentation and creative expression, rather than guaranteed creative achievement.

Creativity measures the tendency to seek new solutions, imagine alternative possibilities and engage in activities involving original expression. High scorers generally enjoy experimenting with ideas, developing unusual approaches or producing something that did not previously exist. They may be drawn towards writing, design, music, invention, programming or problem-solving activities that reward originality.

Lower scorers tend to be more comfortable using established methods and familiar solutions. When confronted with a problem, they may prefer approaches that have already proved successful rather than experimenting with alternatives. This can be entirely sensible when reliability, efficiency or predictability is important. Not every problem requires an original solution, and innovation can become counterproductive when it introduces unnecessary complexity.

Consider two people designing a website. One may enjoy experimenting with layouts, inventing new features and reconsidering conventional approaches to navigation. The other may prefer using familiar design patterns that are already known to work effectively. Both approaches can produce successful results, depending on the objectives and quality of execution.

Creativity should also be distinguished from objective creative ability. Someone may enjoy generating ideas without necessarily producing work that other people regard as original or valuable. Conversely, a person with a relatively low preference for creative experimentation may still produce excellent solutions through accumulated expertise and careful analysis.

A further distinction concerns Conscientiousness. Generating an imaginative idea and developing it into a finished product are different challenges. High Openness may encourage exploration, while Diligence, Organisation and Prudence can contribute to the sustained effort required to turn an idea into something practical. Originality is often most useful when accompanied by the ability to evaluate and implement it.

4. Unconventionality: Receptiveness to the Unusual vs. Preference for Convention

Unconventionality concerns willingness to consider unusual ideas and people, rather than automatically rejecting tradition or authority.

Unconventionality measures an individual's receptiveness to ideas, beliefs and perspectives that depart from conventional expectations. High scorers are generally more willing to entertain unusual possibilities, consider alternative interpretations and engage with people whose views or lifestyles differ from those of the majority. They may enjoy questioning assumptions and exploring perspectives that other people regard as strange, radical or eccentric.

Lower scorers tend to feel more comfortable with familiar conventions and established ways of thinking. They may regard unusual beliefs with greater scepticism, prefer traditional approaches or feel relatively little attraction towards eccentric ideas. This does not necessarily indicate intolerance or intellectual incapacity. Someone may prefer conventional explanations because they have found them reliable or because they see little value in exploring speculative alternatives.

An important distinction exists between Unconventionality and contrarianism. A highly unconventional person does not necessarily reject established beliefs simply because they are popular. They may accept conventional scientific explanations while remaining willing to investigate alternative hypotheses. Conversely, someone who automatically opposes mainstream opinion is not necessarily displaying genuine intellectual openness; reflexive disagreement can become just as rigid as unquestioning conformity.

Unconventionality also does not imply gullibility. Being receptive to an unusual idea is different from believing it without sufficient evidence. A person can consider unfamiliar perspectives seriously while applying rigorous standards when deciding whether those perspectives are credible.

This facet is particularly relevant to understanding differences in how people respond to novelty and social conventions. Some enjoy encountering unfamiliar worldviews and unconventional forms of expression, while others prefer established cultural expectations. Neither tendency guarantees better judgement, fairness or intellectual sophistication.

What Does High Openness Look Like?

People with high Openness tend to find intellectual, artistic and imaginative exploration particularly rewarding. They may enjoy discovering unfamiliar subjects, discussing abstract questions, experimenting with creative ideas or seeking out experiences that broaden their understanding of the world. Their interests can extend beyond immediate practical requirements, and they may be comfortable engaging with questions that have no obvious or definitive answers.

These tendencies can encourage originality and adaptability in situations where established solutions are insufficient. Someone who enjoys exploring alternative possibilities may identify approaches that others overlook, while a willingness to consider unfamiliar perspectives can support learning across different disciplines.

However, high Openness is not universally advantageous. An individual may become distracted by numerous competing interests, devote considerable attention to speculative ideas or struggle to settle on one approach when several possibilities remain appealing. Someone who continually seeks novelty may also become dissatisfied with repetitive activities, even when those activities are necessary to achieve longer-term objectives.

Perhaps the most constructive expression of high Openness involves combining curiosity with critical evaluation. The ability to imagine possibilities is valuable, but so is the capacity to distinguish promising ideas from those that lack evidence or practical value. Intellectual exploration becomes especially productive when it is accompanied by appropriate judgement and sustained effort.

What Does Low Openness Look Like?

Individuals with low Openness generally place less importance on novelty, artistic exploration and unconventional ideas. They may prefer familiar routines, established knowledge and practical solutions that have already demonstrated their usefulness. Rather than investigating unfamiliar subjects for enjoyment, they may concentrate on activities with clear purposes or direct relevance to their everyday lives.

These preferences can support consistency and efficiency in environments where established procedures work well. Someone who is relatively uninterested in experimentation may be comfortable refining existing methods, maintaining dependable routines or applying familiar expertise to practical problems.

Nevertheless, lower Openness can create difficulties when circumstances require substantial adaptation or when conventional approaches no longer produce satisfactory results. An individual who feels little attraction towards unfamiliar ideas may be slower to investigate alternatives, particularly when those alternatives initially appear strange or unnecessary.

Low Openness should not be confused with low intelligence, poor education or a lack of imagination in every area of life. Someone may possess excellent technical abilities, make sound decisions and maintain deep expertise while having little interest in broad intellectual or artistic exploration.

Similarly, conventional preferences do not automatically imply political conservatism, intolerance or opposition to change. Openness is associated with some attitudes and values at the population level, but individual beliefs depend on many influences beyond personality.

Different Combinations of Openness Facets

One of the most useful features of HEXACO is that an overall Openness score can conceal considerable variation. Someone might score highly on Inquisitiveness while scoring relatively low on Aesthetic Appreciation. Such an individual could spend years studying science, mathematics or history while feeling little interest in painting, poetry or music.

Another person might display exceptional Aesthetic Appreciation but relatively modest Inquisitiveness. They may be deeply moved by music, literature and natural beauty while having little desire to investigate scientific theories or acquire knowledge across numerous unrelated subjects.

A third person might combine high Creativity with low Unconventionality. They could enjoy developing original solutions within an established field while maintaining conventional personal beliefs and preferences. Conversely, someone might be receptive to unusual ideas and alternative lifestyles without feeling particularly motivated to produce original work themselves.

These combinations are illustrative rather than officially recognised HEXACO personality types. Their importance lies in demonstrating that intellectual curiosity, aesthetic sensitivity, originality and unconventional thinking are related but distinguishable characteristics.

Openness, Learning and Intellectual Ability

Openness is particularly relevant to education because learning involves encountering unfamiliar information, developing new perspectives and sometimes reconsidering established assumptions. People who enjoy intellectual exploration may be more inclined to investigate subjects independently, read beyond required material or connect ideas from different fields.

However, an important distinction exists between the desire to learn and the ability to learn. A highly inquisitive individual may devote considerable time to complex subjects without necessarily possessing exceptional reasoning ability. Equally, someone with strong cognitive abilities may prefer applying those abilities to familiar practical problems rather than exploring new areas of knowledge.

Research using the Big Five has found positive but generally modest associations between broad Openness and academic achievement, with the strength of these relationships varying across subjects and assessment methods. Intellectual aspects of Openness may be particularly relevant to learning, while aesthetic and experiential interests can show different relationships with academic outcomes.

The distinction also highlights the importance of Conscientiousness. Curiosity may encourage someone to begin studying an unfamiliar subject, but sustained achievement often requires discipline, practice and careful evaluation. A person who enjoys learning new concepts may still struggle to complete a lengthy programme of study if they find routine work difficult.

Openness therefore contributes to understanding intellectual motivation, but it should not be interpreted as a measure of intelligence, educational potential or academic achievement.

Openness, Creativity and Innovation

One of the most extensively studied relationships involving Openness concerns creativity. Research using the Big Five has repeatedly found that higher Openness is associated with greater participation in creative activities, more original thinking and certain forms of creative achievement.

A 2016 study by Kaufman and colleagues investigated the distinction between experiential Openness and intellectual engagement across four samples involving 1,035 participants. The researchers found that the Openness aspect was more closely associated with creative achievement in the arts, while the Intellect aspect was more closely associated with creative achievement in scientific fields.

These findings suggest that creativity is not a single ability expressed identically across every domain. Artistic originality may depend heavily on aesthetic sensitivity, imagination and engagement with emotional experiences, whereas scientific creativity may involve sustained intellectual exploration and the ability to reason about complex problems.

However, this research used a Big Five-based distinction between Openness and Intellect rather than the four HEXACO facets. Its findings therefore provide useful context without establishing that HEXACO Aesthetic Appreciation or Inquisitiveness produces the same specific relationships.

Creative achievement also depends on far more than personality. Knowledge, technical skill, opportunity, practice and persistence all influence whether an original idea develops into a meaningful contribution. A person can possess considerable imagination without producing recognised creative work, just as an experienced professional can develop valuable innovations through disciplined application of existing expertise.

Openness in Education and Career Interests

Openness may influence the kinds of subjects people choose to study and the professional activities they find rewarding. Individuals who enjoy artistic expression, intellectual exploration or original problem-solving may be drawn towards fields that provide opportunities to engage in those interests.

A particularly relevant investigation was published in 2022 by Kibeom Lee, Michael Ashton and Christine Novitsky. The researchers examined HEXACO personality scores across academic majors using data from more than 73,000 participants. Openness showed the largest average differences between fields of study among the six HEXACO dimensions.

Students in Visual and Performing Arts and Humanities tended to score higher on Openness, while those in Health Sciences and Business or Commerce averaged lower. The study also found that individual facets sometimes revealed differences that were not apparent from broad personality scores alone.

These results demonstrate that Openness is meaningfully associated with educational interests, although they do not establish that personality determines academic choices or success. Students within every field show substantial individual variation, and the findings reflect associations in the samples studied rather than universal descriptions of particular professions.

The relationship also offers an interesting connection to Holland's RIASEC career-interest model. Inquisitiveness may resemble aspects of Investigative interests, while Aesthetic Appreciation and Creativity may overlap conceptually with Artistic interests. However, HEXACO measures personality tendencies, whereas RIASEC measures preferences for particular kinds of work and activities. The two frameworks should not be treated as interchangeable.

Openness in Everyday Life and Relationships

Openness can influence how people spend their free time, approach unfamiliar experiences and respond to differences in interests or beliefs. Higher scorers may enjoy discussing ideas, exploring unfamiliar places, discovering new artistic interests or engaging in conversations that challenge their assumptions. Lower scorers may prefer familiar activities, practical discussions and experiences they already know they enjoy.

These differences can become noticeable in friendships and romantic relationships. One partner might enjoy visiting museums, discussing philosophical questions and experimenting with unfamiliar activities, while another prefers familiar routines and shared interests that have already proved satisfying. Neither preference necessarily indicates greater intelligence, affection or commitment.

Difficulties may arise when one person interprets the other's preferences negatively. A highly open individual may mistake a partner's preference for familiar activities as narrow-mindedness, while the less open partner may regard constant experimentation as unnecessary or impractical. Recognising these as differences in temperament can encourage more realistic expectations.

Openness is also distinct from interpersonal tolerance and ethical behaviour. Someone may enjoy unconventional art and ideas while behaving impatiently or unfairly towards others. Conversely, a relatively conventional person may be exceptionally honest, generous and respectful. These characteristics involve other personality dimensions and cannot be inferred from Openness alone.

What Does Research Tell Us About Openness?

Openness to Experience is one of the broad personality dimensions supported by the cross-language research underlying the HEXACO model. It also closely resembles the corresponding Big Five dimension, allowing researchers to draw on a substantial body of earlier findings while recognising differences between assessment instruments.

Research has repeatedly associated Openness with creativity and intellectual exploration. Studies have also shown that narrower aspects of the dimension can relate differently to particular outcomes. For example, the distinction between aesthetic and intellectual engagement helps explain why artistic and scientific creativity do not necessarily share identical personality predictors.

The 2022 study of academic majors provides particularly relevant evidence within the HEXACO framework. Its finding that Openness displayed the largest average differences across academic disciplines supports the idea that curiosity, creativity and aesthetic interests are meaningfully connected to educational preferences.

Nevertheless, personality research primarily describes statistical relationships between characteristics and outcomes. High Openness does not guarantee originality, achievement or good judgement, while lower Openness does not prevent someone from producing valuable ideas or acquiring sophisticated knowledge.

A comprehensive interpretation therefore requires attention to individual facets, other personality dimensions and the circumstances in which a person's interests and abilities develop.

Connecting Openness to Other Personality Models

HEXACO and Big Five Openness

HEXACO Openness and Big Five Openness are closely related, although their facet structures differ. In the widely used NEO framework, Big Five Openness includes Fantasy, Aesthetics, Feelings, Actions, Ideas and Values. HEXACO instead distinguishes Aesthetic Appreciation, Inquisitiveness, Creativity and Unconventionality.

The similarities are considerable, particularly in their shared emphasis on intellectual curiosity, artistic engagement and receptiveness to unfamiliar possibilities. However, some characteristics receive different attention within each framework. HEXACO explicitly includes a Creativity facet, while the NEO approach separately examines openness to feelings, actions and values.

Consequently, an individual who scores highly on one assessment will often score highly on the other, but the scores should not be expected to match perfectly. Differences in questionnaire content and facet structure can produce meaningful variation.

HEXACO Openness and MBTI

The most obvious conceptual comparison is the MBTI Sensing–Intuition distinction. Intuition is commonly associated with interest in patterns, possibilities and abstract ideas, while Sensing descriptions emphasise concrete information, direct experience and practical details.

These themes resemble certain aspects of Openness, particularly Inquisitiveness and Creativity. However, the constructs are not identical, and MBTI categories should not be used to infer HEXACO scores.

Someone identifying as an INTJ or INTP may enjoy abstract thinking while having relatively little interest in artistic experiences or unconventional lifestyles. Conversely, an individual identifying as an ISFP or ISTJ might possess considerable artistic sensitivity, intellectual curiosity or creative ability.

The comparison may help readers familiar with MBTI understand some of the themes involved, but it does not establish a scientifically validated one-to-one relationship.

HEXACO Openness and the Enneagram

Several Enneagram descriptions contain themes resembling aspects of Openness. Type 5, commonly associated with intellectual investigation and the pursuit of knowledge, may invite comparisons with Inquisitiveness. Type 4 descriptions frequently emphasise individuality, artistic expression and unconventional perspectives, while Type 7 is often associated with exploration and the pursuit of varied experiences.

However, these similarities are conceptual rather than established statistical relationships. The Enneagram and HEXACO were developed through different approaches, and the available evidence does not justify assigning reliable Openness scores to particular Enneagram types.

A Type 5 individual might be highly inquisitive but relatively conventional, while a Type 4 individual could possess strong aesthetic sensitivity without displaying broad intellectual curiosity. The HEXACO facets provide a more precise framework for examining these differences.

Understanding Your Own Openness Score

When reflecting on Openness, it is useful to consider what naturally attracts your attention. Do you enjoy exploring subjects that have little immediate practical relevance, simply because you find them interesting? Are you deeply affected by music, art or natural beauty? When solving problems, do you prefer experimenting with original approaches or using methods that have already proved effective?

Consider also your response to unfamiliar ideas. Are you interested in understanding perspectives that differ substantially from your own, or do you generally prefer conventional explanations and familiar ways of thinking? When you encounter an unusual claim, do you feel curious about investigating it, or do you find such possibilities relatively unappealing?

These questions illustrate the underlying dimension, but a structured personality assessment offers a more systematic approach. Questionnaire results should be interpreted as estimates of general tendencies rather than definitive statements about someone's abilities or identity.

Examining the four facets separately is especially useful. Someone might display exceptional intellectual curiosity while possessing relatively little aesthetic sensitivity. Another person might be artistically imaginative but comparatively uninterested in scientific or philosophical exploration.

Such combinations demonstrate why Openness should not be reduced to a simple distinction between curious and incurious, creative and uncreative, or conventional and unconventional individuals.

Final Thoughts

Openness to Experience represents one of the most intellectually interesting dimensions of the HEXACO personality model because it concerns the ways in which people explore ideas, appreciate beauty, generate possibilities and respond to the unfamiliar.

By distinguishing Aesthetic Appreciation, Inquisitiveness, Creativity and Unconventionality, HEXACO provides a more detailed account of human curiosity and imagination than a single broad personality label can offer.

Perhaps its most important insight is that being intellectually curious is not necessarily the same as being intelligent, and being unconventional is not necessarily the same as being original or correct. Someone may possess considerable reasoning ability while preferring familiar subjects, or embrace unusual ideas without evaluating them critically.

Research associates Openness with meaningful differences in creativity, educational interests and intellectual engagement, but these relationships are statistical rather than deterministic. Originality, achievement and sound judgement depend on abilities, effort, knowledge and circumstances as well as personality.

Like every HEXACO dimension, Openness is best understood as a pattern of individual differences rather than a fixed identity or a measure of personal worth. Its value lies in helping explain why some people feel compelled to explore possibilities beyond the familiar, while others find greater satisfaction in established knowledge and proven approaches.

Ultimately, Openness reminds us that curiosity can take many forms. The scientist investigating an unfamiliar phenomenon, the artist exploring a new technique and the individual who enjoys contemplating unusual perspectives may all express different aspects of the same broad personality dimension.

Research and Further Reading

• Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. HEXACO-PI-R: Official Scale Descriptions. The original researchers' definitions of Openness to Experience and its four component facets.

• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Advantages of the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. A foundational discussion of the HEXACO framework and its relationship with the Big Five.

• Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., & Novitsky, C. (2022). Academic Majors and HEXACO Personality. Journal of Career Assessment, 30(2). A large study involving more than 73,000 participants, examining HEXACO differences across academic disciplines.

• Kaufman, S. B., et al. (2016). Openness to Experience and Intellect Differentially Predict Creative Achievement in the Arts and Sciences. Journal of Personality, 84(2), 248–258. Research examining different aspects of Openness and their associations with artistic and scientific creativity.

• McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, Divergent Thinking, and Openness to Experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258–1265. An influential investigation of the relationship between Openness and creative thinking.

Explore next

• Honesty–Humility (HEXACO)

• Emotionality (HEXACO)

• Extraversion (HEXACO)

• Agreeableness (HEXACO)

• Conscientiousness (HEXACO)

• HEXACO personality model

• Browse all six HEXACO traits

• Take the HEXACO personality test